As an epidemiologist who curates an account about absolute and relative risk @justsaysrisks, I do indeed understand the intricacies here. The hilarity comes mostly from you misrepresenting relative risk as some kind of evil plothttps://twitter.com/ClarkeMicah/status/1340068351142490113 …
-
-
But isn't it the exact same information? Just that instead of saying mask wearers had 14% less people infected than no mask wearers, we can say mask wearers had 0.306% more people who did not get infected than those who did not wear masks.
-
You can, but it's a logically flawed transformation
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.