Huge limitation of this analysis: the comparator group. Methods give extremely little detail, no apparent attempt to even match for study type (e.g. feeding trial). Would love to see a case-control study type broken down by study type here & with additional details like prereg.https://twitter.com/TamarHaspel/status/1339309580799660033 …
-
-
I see that, but haven't noticed as much of the industry divide. Tons of over-highlighting of per protocol analyses, ignoring null primary outcomes & inappropriate stats throughout academia. Genuinely curious what the numbers look like by study design
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.