Fraud is rare and not my main issue. Bad studies that cannot answer the question are ubiquitous, and do not actually give you any useful information on the issue at hand
The overall state is that most of the studies are not designed to give us useful information, and that they don't. I have said this many times before
-
-
What is your precise critique...? I see allusions to insufficiencies in protocol coupled with absolutist statements totally dismissing the reported results. I provided a number of suggestions on study inclusion and endpoints above to attempt to address this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.