Would be interesting to see the child's perspective here, because of nothing else there are many signs that the author is not a very reliable narratorhttps://twitter.com/michaelkoziol/status/1337887946897203200 …
-
Show this thread
-
For example, the author says they are totally accepting but look at the language here Both a bit offensive and some definite red flagspic.twitter.com/R651mvz8Ig
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
The author claims to want to support their child in making the right decision for themselves, but given that the child apparently identifies as a trans boy, but they've consistently identified them as a cis girl, it seems clear what decision the author considers the best choicepic.twitter.com/qD3ziLB83J
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likesShow this thread
This is, of course, aside from the other issues with sharing this piece, but I suspect that if the @smh had done the barest of due diligence they would've found that there is more than one side to this story @michaelkoziol
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.