Journals that I've personally seen publish papers with obvious errors in them during 2020: JAMA JAMA Open NEJM BMJ BMJ EBM Lancet Nature Nature Scientific Reports PNAS Etc...https://twitter.com/Constababble/status/1337856650963603456 …
-
-
Nature SR is a whole can of worms, they published a study claiming phone use can make people grow horns.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
make a thread! (also you should probably submit responses/comments but i won't see those, so an educational thread would be ideal for my purposes)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You forgot jama peds
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Get some economists on their editorial boards and referee registers, I guarantee acceptance rates will plunge.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
...and that’s precisely why I really, really enjoy your threads. Because it helps me greatly to not blindly accept papers from major journals...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is there a journal with clean records?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please share!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Should make for relatively trivial systematic review once 2020 is over to quantify the lowered editorial standards for publishing in a handful of high-impact journals.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If there was no patina of respectability or pecking order of brands maybe the reported research would have to stand on its own.
@researchersone for example.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.