This is not about any specific event, just a lot of ridiculous things that have happened this year
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
...and you haven't even brought up corruption. Very forebearing by you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Most academics I know are trying to do their jobs as responsibly as is feasible given the competing demands for our time. It is not clear to me that it is helpful to focus on failures without mentioning the vast majority of academics who are working diligently and in good faith.
-
I think the challenge is that the incentives make the system fundamentally broken in important ways i.e. reviewers don't do cursory reviews because they're bad people, but because they're doing unpaid work in their spare time for massive for-profit journal companies
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think this take is too harsh. Criticism is necessary to our growth. But we have enough people on Twitter trying to publicly delegitimize the academy. (Many doing so in bad faith.) Majority of scholars I’d argue are sincere and care about their craft.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Um...don’t say that. I’ve been working to get a manuscript published for almost two years. They picked that thing apart limb from limb!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Let me guess, ... Your submission to JAMA Network got rejected.
-
Nope, Nature:Leftovers only took $2k from him and desk rejected.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.