Proposal: everyone producing high quality semi-professional* post-publication methods critique should invoice the major health journals for our time this year + a damages section for health impact. * it's not really professional since no one is actually paying
-
-
I think about it all the time. And it would be bizarre until you consider that journals' models are effectively predicated on their being the primary distributors of science + having and preserving a monopoly on critique. And since the former isn't relevant anymore....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.