Every paper that was retracted for fraud/errors went through "rigorous peer review"
-
Show this thread
-
Even if we assume that peer review is a very good system, it has an error rate. Given the sheer volume of published papers, there should be thousands of corrections/retractions a year There aren't
6 replies 5 retweets 49 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @GidMK
Your age-IFR paper already mentioned the Streeck study missing after-study deaths, therefor underestimating IFR in Gangelt. It's recently been published on Nature Communications. Big scandal in Germany right now.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @lakkoploutos
Yeh I've heard. We didn't actually use that study for other reasons, but it's pretty worrying that it may have been deceptive I think
4:24 PM - 8 Dec 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.