Every paper that was retracted for fraud/errors went through "rigorous peer review"
-
-
Science is to nice, we should be brutal towards the truth. For all our sakes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
TBH the position that having been peer reviewed means that it is now perfect is a weird take for a process which exists because people and their work are not perfect
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your age-IFR paper already mentioned the Streeck study missing after-study deaths, therefor underestimating IFR in Gangelt. It's recently been published on Nature Communications. Big scandal in Germany right now.
-
Yeh I've heard. We didn't actually use that study for other reasons, but it's pretty worrying that it may have been deceptive I think
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
1/ “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2/ I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as editor of The New England Journal of Medicine”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.