every academic ever in private: "these reviewers don't know what they're talking about" upon public critique: "peer review is beyond reproach"
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'll gladly peer-review your comment asap if that would get a better response :)
-
I'll be reviewer #3
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would be curious to see the peer reviews that the editor of JAMA Pediatrics gets in JAMA Open. Did the normal editors all recuse themselves?
-
This is a really good point. For a paper this flawed to get through peer review is highly concerning. I'm sure
@JAMANetworkOpen is looking into this given the florid problems with the article and the potential COIs.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The paper could have been submitted other places where it was rejected by peer review. The comment may not have been peer reviewed but we know for a fact that it hasn't failed peer review.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When a paper is that wrong it needs to go through not just peer review but sneer review as well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.