Ugh both the headline and the study it's based on are...pretty dubious Let's look at some science on twitter 1/npic.twitter.com/CY9kuG8mxi
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
9/n For example, we know that asthma diagnoses are very variable by many characteristics, which may also make people more or less likely to go get tested for COVID-19 (young men, for example - lots of asthma, might avoid testing)pic.twitter.com/VvkzTdo93f
10/n It also makes correcting for confounding challenging, because we do not know which biases are influencing the SELECTION of participants
11/n Ultimately, it's a bit hard to say more than that people with asthma were less likely to have a positive COVID-19 test in the group of people presenting for testing in Israel earlier this year
12/n While that's a bit less sensational than the headline, it's also a bit more truepic.twitter.com/LLhY2Dw0EK
13/n I should also note - the study itself is fine, generally, but the limitations section doesn't really discuss some of the biggest drawbacks of their methodology which I don't lovepic.twitter.com/iHFE2FPRyA
14/n Anyway, the most likely explanation to me for fewer people with asthma getting COVID-19 is that we told them to be careful not to catch the respiratory infection because they could easily die and so they were more careful Inhalers? Ehhhhh
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.