My 2 cs: Arguing about whether IFR was .15 vs.75 vs .55 allowed many to escape the harder discussion of whether John, despite errors, may have a point about the severe & unseen harms of lockdown. It was easier to make him a villain than talk to him. Popular tactic these dayshttps://twitter.com/TheSGEM/status/1333455309013196803 …
-
-
I even said as much many times - the points would've been incredibly important if they weren't preceded with, for example, the myth that existing T cell immunity meant that most people were already immune
-
If half of the population was immune through another mechanism, then the R_0 would be twice as high as we had thought
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
1. Many people were expressing concerns about the negative impacts of NPI’s, including those who advocated for them such as Neil Ferguson. He added nothing uniquely valuable. 2. His error ridden commentary on the IFR and impacts of NPI’s gave the deniers intellectual cover.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.