Everyone produces pyramids of evidence, so I thought I'd make one for issues in published research Fraud is (relatively) rare, but it is not the only issue we should be talking aboutpic.twitter.com/3Of3RDUAAA
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I agree, this graphic is more about issues in individual published studies, as a whole bad study design and/or statistical analysis are the bigger issues by far
Maybe nitpicking, but were you intending the width to be frequency, and the height to be severity? Either way, I always argue that bad design is worse than bad stats or even errors. Bad design is an existential threat, doomed before it happens and it unrecoverable.
Yep. To be honest, I wanted to have bad stats/design in the same level because they're the same thing essentially, but it didn't look very good. I was more thinking here about things that should get a paper retracted
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.