I Read the article (archived links in the thread) I'm sorry, but this is not acceptable in science. We can't delete, censor and retract, if a claim is not fraudulent. We certainly can't simply because an analysis is misused. Censoring is a grave threat to science.https://twitter.com/JHUNewsLetter/status/1332100136152035330 …
-
-
Also worth noting that the video of the presentation is still online so when you say deletion you are referring specifically to the newsletter, not the analysis in question which has by no definition been censored
-
YouTube’s a little slow. Guessing that video drops from the platform within the next week, especially if it starts getting passed around by “the wrong people”
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Having trouble wrapping my head around this and I'm really trying. A death is a death, and at the end of the day we are simply counting how many died. If that's a bigger number than what's expected, that's an excess. Doesn't matter what causes they come from or don't come from.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.