It would be a lot easier to take the "lockdown skeptics" more seriously if they didn't insist on making continuous, basic errors
-
-
Thanks, so basically, data isnt good and you disagree with how inference is done. Ironically this is identical in concept to how Yeadon and other ravers establish grounds for a casedemic. Sounds like talks should be at the resolution of "when and how can we causally infer"
-
Honestly, this is very different to that situation. The intricacies of casual inference are one issue - Yeadon's mathematical errors quite another
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.