Retraction of error-filled analysis =/= "censorship"https://twitter.com/VPrasadMDMPH/status/1332149885374668802 …
-
-
I can’t speak to how folks have thought about retraction, it it seems to be changing.
-
I think we should normalize retraction as much as possible. Even if peer review were a fantastic system, errors would creep through - there are simply too many papers for this not to happen. We should all consider retraction the price to pay for good science imo
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Retraction for faulty work should be normal. People reading peer-reviewed articles are not always steeped in the specialism or regular readers of a journal. Is the revulsion against retraction a hangover from before everything was digital and thus less easily revisable than now?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.