In any other discipline, if you made obvious and repeated mathematical mistakes it would be expected that you get rid of the article, but in academia this is frowned upon It is a very strange system indeed
-
-
Show this thread
-
Also worth noting that what
@VPrasadMDMPH is objecting to is not scientific censorship by any account, because what was deleted here was the press release put out by the university newsletter...Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
+ any mistake pointed out is an "ad hominem" attack (I often feel that people use Latin when they would be embarrassed to formulate the same idea in plain English)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Simply because analysis is misused”


I am ded. -
Yes it's ludicrous to retract a press release simply because all the numbers were made up! What next??????
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Re: "error-filled analysis" It's like thinking: 'Replacing 100 heart disease (HD) deaths with 200 COVID-19 deaths doesn't count as excess deaths, if 100 of those COVID-19 deaths would have died of HD anyway. Just ignore the fact that [200 - 100] > 0'
https://twitter.com/JHUNewsLetter/status/1332398381751169024 …pic.twitter.com/165pJ8NqVc
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.