These highly efficient vaccines are likely great news for infection conferred immunity to Covid Those advocating to adopt Sweden’s approach, for example, have the goal of minimizing death too! Stop this “holier than thou” BS You are not morally superior
-
-
Replying to @TheEliKlein
I never said I was morally superior, I'm pointing out that the reality of effective vaccination in the near future makes their proposed strategy (which oddly enough isn't Sweden's approach) enormously costly with little benefit
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
It’s just much more complicated than that. Vaccines don’t change the argument. I predicted the current vaccine timeline in April amd it wasn’t hard to glean. The benefit of 1 billion people already being infected naturally is massive to an unknown extent.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheEliKlein
1 billion people already infected is a ludicrously high estimate, where did you see that figure?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
I was referring to by the time mass vaccinations are deployed to help crush covid worldwide / eventual natural infections I read someone at the WHO said 10% of the world was infected already and that was more than a month ago Hundreds of millions in India alone
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheEliKlein
The WHO said that "well below 10%" were infected, and it is very unlikely that hundreds of millions have been infected in India alone. You are simply parroting myths here
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
That’s just simply false and if you don’t think more than 100 million in India have been infected then you’re not looking at enough datahttps://apnews.com/article/virus-outbreak-archive-united-nations-54a3a5869c9ae4ee623497691e796083 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheEliKlein
Health Nerd Retweeted Marc Bevand
Yes that's simply bad reporting https://twitter.com/zorinaq/status/1314160523613593600?s=20 … And given the fatality rate and age breakdown, it's very unlikely that more than 100mil have been infected. Nearly 100mil perhaps
Health Nerd added,
Marc Bevand @zorinaqThe media claimed "about 10% of the global population may have been infected by the coronavirus"—eg. https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/10/05/920453483/10-of-global-population-may-have-contracted-the-coronavirus-who-says … I investigated the claim. It's false. Bad reporting In reality "LESS than 10%" & in many situations it's "WELL UNDER 10%" of the general population 1/nShow this thread1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @TheEliKlein
You can literally listen to the full interviews yourself rather that trusting the words of the anonymous account "Free Beer". It's very clear that the total global infection rate was not 10% at that point however you slice it
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
I mean, even the statement that everyone is quoting is enormously vague. The WHO official doesn't say "exactly 10% are infected" he says "we estimate around 10%...it varies...it varies...it varies" etc
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.