Adds more to the storyhttps://twitter.com/jljcolorado/status/1330542699250929664 …
-
-
Amazingly, I've just noticed that even THIS paper isn't the actual evidence, because the finding that 44% of transmissions occurred during pre/asymptomatic periods is inferred based on the findings of yet another paper from way back in March!pic.twitter.com/HG2ZOWkoW6
-
Fascinating detective work. Honestly, following you has been eye-opening on many occasions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes. This is how “facts” are made...keep going and you find an important but still speculative paper from the first three months turned into models turned into facts. It’s a legit phenomenon. Trust nothing but primary data and don’t trust that unless confirmed?!?!
-
Yeh it's a really interesting point, because it appears that this CDC update is essentially based on the epidemiological investigation from January that used pneumonia as their benchmark for symptom onset
pic.twitter.com/kz4lmQ2zqV
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
