I always find this perspective so bizarre. How can someone's perspective be so devalued by the forum in which it appears? Some of the best statistical critique I've seen has come from twitter!https://twitter.com/NAChristakis/status/1330311819672608769 …
-
-
I've written 3 errata. (The most serious error was a transcription error giving the wrong measurements for one star in a 50 star survey.) Those were accepted quite quickly.
-
I've seen plenty of instances of later papers refuting earlier ones, usually the literature catches up quite quickly judging by later papers referring to those works in their introductions. Public repositories like Wikipedia seem not to take account of refuting works as quickly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.