Also, I love the term "clinically tested" because it is so totally meaningless. What were they testing? Were the results positive? Was it one component of the product (usually) or something more useful (almost never)?
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wtaf?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But 9 out of 10 people surveyed said that it visibly reduced the appearance of fine lines.........
-
I must be the 1 out of 10 that it doesn't work on.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Glycerine and lanolin are probably the only ingredients that have evidence.
-
I think Retinol too?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I’ve always thought that WD40 might do the trick.
-
"WD-40 Company does not recommend the use of WD-40® for medical purposes WD-40® contains petroleum distillates and should be handled with the same precautions for any product containing this type of material."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah. me when looking at supplements: "these claims are spurious.. where are the rct's? Me when looking at skincare "omg this will refurbish and make myb skin luminescent!!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Paula Begoun has been writing huge reference books about this since forever. Last time I checked there were a couple of skin creams that genuinely helped. They're not expensive. The rest is beautifully packaged junk.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.