I could not disagree with this more. If we do not retract flawed research with the purpose to cause harm, what is the point of retraction at all?https://twitter.com/NAChristakis/status/1329471888180072452 …
-
-
I am still really interested in knowing what you'd say here. If a scientific journal publishes work that is so flawed that it would fail an undergraduate class, with obvious statistical errors and the like, as JAMA (for example) has recently done, what would you recommend?
-
There is really zero ambiguity on this question. The first reason for retraction in
@C0PE guidelines (http://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.4 …) frames it crystal-clear.
major error, intentional or not, *is* a reason for retraction
pic.twitter.com/wBtiosxofI
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.