If you want to know a bit more about the study, I wrote a thread on what it doesn't mean herehttps://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1329171522485772288?s=19 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
If you want to know a bit more about the study, I wrote a thread on what it doesn't mean herehttps://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1329171522485772288?s=19 …
Why was I not aware of this before - I have so many papers that would easily get rejected by those journals.
I've even had papers rejected from 2 of the 3, but never the Viral Trifecta
For the record, I have had two manuscripts submitted to and rejected by all three of those.
No wonder you're so famous!
You also need to start rumours that those journals are not brave enough to publish your study.
To be fair, great scientific research, generally, isn't fun. And fun scientific research, generally, isn't great. I, actually, think that the study you are obliquely referencing is a good study, but it is WAY too easy to misinterpret the findings.
I guess methodological shortcomings may have a bit to do with these, rejection and virality.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.