8/n A reduction in risk of infection of 20% would be a bit meaningless to the individual but HUGE at a population level, so this is not a minor point
Sure, but that doesn't correct for test characteristics it corrects for the possibility that they included people who they shouldn't have in the study
-
-
Correct, that's why I think you should run the correction on those numbers from the sensitivity analysis, not their main numbers.
-
Oh right. Yes, but either way it doesn't make a difference to the OR, and it reduces the number below the powered figure
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.