important piece re: pfizer vaccine.https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1326304265304903680 …
-
-
Replying to @drvyom
@gidmk Too many things to correct, but a few things: the trial isn't at less half recruited - it might even be fully recruited. Original interim events wasn't 64: they were 32, 62, 92, 120. 94 infections weren't across the study - only Covid-free people 7 days after 2nd shot..1/2pic.twitter.com/MNykMegaix
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hildabast @drvyom
Oh yep I should correct the 64 typo! Fully recruited possibly, but I didn't say half just that it wasn't done yet. I do specify the 28-day timepoint and the three week schedule so I'm confused about that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
(1) It's not just a typo - 62 wasn't the original first interim analysis. (2) You did
(3) 7+ days after 2nd shot isn't exactly the same as 28-days (unspecified) & it's still not restricted to the people who were known to be Covid-free.pic.twitter.com/JjwgwMGxau
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hildabast @drvyom
I'm not sure I'd agree that's an error as such, I was more focused on the meaning of such an analysis to people rather than the discussion with the FDA about the initially planned interim analysis. I don't see where I say half? I'm very confused?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Oh shoot - you're right: sorry - I shouldn't have started this if I wasn't going to spend at least 15 minutes on it.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
I'm always grateful when you take a look at my stuff lol, you are the best at pointing out mistakes!
-
-
Thanks, but tbh, I try not to look at it because of this. (And don't assume all the errors have been found - I only read half of it.)
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.