For all the absurd noise about "academic silencing" throughout the year, it's interesting to note that it hasn't appeared to have stopped anyone getting papers accepted, published, and cited hundreds of times
-
-
I mean, most of the academics who talk about silencing have done so on massive media platforms and have carried that through to enormous academic acclaim We're all scientists here. By what possible metrics have they been silenced?
Show this thread -
One thing that's been claimed is that the silencing has been of other people who have been terrified to agree with them. This is obviously false, so how have they been silenced? I'm really interested here
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They talk about making it to a peer review journal. It should have.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I misparsed that as 'Santa Claus' and you know what, my brain might have been right the first time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Their strategy of using social media to recruit should rank as a textbook example of how not to sample a population. This is seeking bias as opposed to mitigating them
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.