I don’t remember seeing the Imperial model for this.https://www.bbc.com/news/education-54827702 …
-
-
Replying to @cjsnowdon
Wow that's a misleading headline. A 'huge' rise of 20% which equates to 10 cases and maybe 1 death? In the whole country across months?
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
I think the 20% rise refers to the injuries and deaths of children, of which there were over 300 in the 2020 period.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cjsnowdon
The first sentence "there was a 20% rise" Second paragraph says that this equates to 64 incidents. So roughly up from 52 to 64. Not exactly a huge increase!
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
This article makes it clearer which figure it’s referring to.https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-lockdown-babies-killed-england-b1640952.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cjsnowdon
Those are the same figures - 300 incidents involving children, 64 of which (40%) were babies, a 20% increase from last year. So numerically about 10 more incidents
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @cjsnowdon
Not for babies, unless both of these articles are misrepresenting the figures. 300 events in children, but the only increase cited was in babies, where the number of events has gone from about 2.5 cases per 100,000 to 3
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Well, if those figures are accurate then COVID in the UK has been more than SIX TIMES as deadly as lockdowns to children
That statement is misleading too, but similarly factual 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.