That's how communication works nowadays: WHO says you are losing control over 5% => US says up to 5% is fine.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's a matter of goals, and the status of the epidemic. There was a period where really high testing in AUS was a problem because the labs were falling behind while testing very-low probability people. That was delaying the tracing of actual cases.
-
This is a very good example of something (resource constraints) that has a strong effect on the unrolling of the epidemic, is very possible to explicitly model but yet is nearly always treated as exogenous in epi models.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In South Africa, the "5%'" mental threshold seems to be 8%!
@DrZweliMkhize@HealthZA@nicd_saThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
15% was considered adequate in France. 20% is adequate to keep schools open with minimal measures.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We are nearing a 50% positivity rate here in South Dakota.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.