Interesting new preprint on #LongCovid. Some take-homes:
- ~14% of people
- can last months
- associated with +symptoms, previous respiratory disease, gender, age
- not associated with metabolic disease (mostly)https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.19.20214494v1 …
-
-
A good way of thinking about it is, I reckon, to say that
#LongCovid does appear to impact a reasonable fraction of people, but exactly who they are is still up in the air and requires much more researchShow this thread -
It's also worth noting that we still don't know how much COVID-19 differs from other respiratory diseases in this context, although this study does seem to indicate that those who tested positive for COVID-19 were more likely to experience long-lasting symptomspic.twitter.com/5w3lgCwpag
Show this thread -
Also, I should note that the fact that this data was gathered through an app is definitely an issue. I've actually published research on attrition in app-based interventions, it's a tricky subject https://www.jmir.org/2020/9/e20283/
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The people who got Covid19 in the UK in the first wave could mostly only get a test if they were admitted to hospital. So those with longcovid longest with a positive test would mostly be hospitalized.
-
Well, they limited their analysis to only those who'd had a PCR +ve test to try and account for that sort of bias but I agree that it's impossible to infer population estimates from this data
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.