Controversial opinion: those that say its not possible to shield the vulnerable, also won't be able to prove if there is a difference (or lack of it) between the trajectory of the virus at Madrid and Stockholm. Who do you think has let it rip?
-
-
Similarly, the proportion asymptomatic is probably around a 3x overestimate based on best evidencehttps://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003346 …
-
The other issue is that you can't easily compare across seroepidemiological samples in terms of the ratio in age groups as you have done, because some of them used probabilistic sampling and some did not (i.e. the ratio differences could be explained by sampling)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Incorrect. Immunity level estimation sensitivity to Do is 0 (zero). Check Appendix II.
-
If you change Do (or any other parameter) of course you have to refit phase I to find infected on spread day and 1st isolation to vulnerable. Use "FIT 1st phase button" and change isolation to healthy <60 until predicted serology ratio matches reported.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.