I have great respect for people willing to take on the difficult question of balancing direct COVID-19 harms against the damage that control measures can do I have no respect at all for people who minimize the harms of COVID-19 in order to make this argument
-
Show this thread
-
Yes, there are harms to disease-prevention measures. We should certainly be weighing these against the potential harms that unmitigated epidemics do and think carefully about our choices
2 replies 2 retweets 68 likesShow this thread -
But pretending that we can largely ignore COVID-19 without cost is just a disingenuous and nonsensical position that flies in the face of all evidence gathered to date
4 replies 5 retweets 97 likesShow this thread -
Also, if you are ignorant enough to ignore the secondary BENEFITS to COVID-19 restrictions (e.g. influenza deaths) in your assessment, then I would say your argument is entirely political and has no basis in science
5 replies 9 retweets 88 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Nope, I'm pointing out scientific fact. It is true that COVID-19 regulation has had secondary benefits - to say otherwise isn't political, it's wrong
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.