Two main errors there. Firstly, the previous pandemic death tolls were ESTIMATED using EXCESS MORTALITY and pneumonia diagnoses (among other things). Comparing them with confirmed COVID-19 fatalities makes no sense
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
For e.g. we know that some countries are undercounting COVID-19 deaths by as much as 50%, so if you were to estimate a total death toll thus far it would be much higher
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The second issue is that the other pandemics took place over quite long periods of time, while COVID-19 has only been a pandemic disease for ~8 months. The 'final' death toll is extremely hard to predict at this point
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @sabhlok
No, but they could plausibly be, say, 30% higher worldwide right now, and double over the next 6 months. It's also worth noting that the massive global intervention makes it very challenging to compare this pandemic to earlier ones
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @sabhlok
That's simply not true - it varies by country, of course, but generally speaking COVID-19 deaths are well recorded in the west, or are an underestimate (i.e. U.S.). This is demonstrable fact
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It is similarly incorrect to say that the pandemic is OVER anywhere. Even some of the communities with very high rates of infection are seeing resurgences now (numerous examples include communities in NYC, Spain etc)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I'm not advocating for any particular policy, merely pointing out that you are factually wrong 
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @sabhlok
No I'm saying that the factual statements you made - I.e. that the death count in Western countries is a large overestimate - are incorrect
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.