I don't think you understand my point. A Github repository is fine, but having lots of inconclusive research doesn't add up to a definitive answer, it leaves you with the same question just using more words
Nah, it's just a pointless dichotomization. I wouldn't take the bet because the evidence ISN'T THERE - I'm not saying vit D is useless, but that we have no idea if it works or not. Also, most of the experts are (like me) unable to easily proffer $100,000 in assets for silly bets
-
-
If nothing else, the vague wording makes it almost certain that the bet would come down to a legal battle. There will undoubtedly be dozens or 100s of studies in 2022 looking at the question - which ones count? What does the bit about general acceptance actually mean? etc etc
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's explained in the post. Anyway, this discussion is no longer cost/effective in saving lives, so I'm out. Take care.
-
No worries. As I said, if you need epidemiological/study design on a vitamin D RCT, I am happy to provide it for free. These things are important!
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.