2/n The study is here if you want to read it - a very simple retrospective epidemiological paper:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239799 …
-
-
13/n While I could go into the results a bit more - the statistical analysis is a little bit meaningless, the confounding factors not really even considered - but honestly there's not really much point I think
Show this thread -
14/n The results show a vague correlation between vit D and some outcomes, with a smattering of statistical significance if you run the analyses in certain ways Not much that you can take away from that, I think
Show this thread -
15/n If nothing else, the small sample size makes it hard to conclude anything from these results other than "we need BETTER research"
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Whether or not the recommendation is reasonable is an economic question. If it's cheap and low enough risk, we don't need as low a p-value or as certain a causal connection to recommend it. And once we recommend it, we get more data. And if it doesn't help, we'll find out soon.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.