Two rejections for two different papers on strength of causal inference methods before 9:15am this morning. Meanwhile, in JAMA land:https://twitter.com/Atul_Gawande/status/1307652736255746050 …
-
Show this thread
-
I really should just give up at this point.
4 replies 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
Noah Haber Retweeted David Nunan
Can neither confirm nor deny toshness of papers, but can assure everyone that neither makes unjustifiable and misleading claims related to important public health topics based on obviously weak methods and poor interpretation.https://twitter.com/dnunan79/status/1308406743093981186 …
Noah Haber added,
David Nunan @dnunan79A good (bad) example of how the academic publishing by system, on the whole, prefers clickable (£$) over good science. And how we are all trapped in it (or do we have a choice?). The articles here of course could be tosh - I’ve given the benefit of doubt to the authors. https://twitter.com/NoahHaber/status/1308396135237681152 …2 replies 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread
Replying to @NoahHaber
Bit generous to call them methods in that study tbh
1:48 PM - 22 Sep 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.