Perhaps unsurprisingly for a blog called "lockdown skeptics", this piece makes basic mathematical and epidemiological mistakes. In fact, very few positive COVID-19 tests are falsehttps://twitter.com/JuliaHB1/status/1307586325663698945 …
-
-
Yup. The "Lockdown Sceptics" just brazenly leave out the part of your paper that undermines their position.
February 2020:
"Based on these available analyses, current IFR estimates10,11,12 range from 0.3% to 1%. "
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200219-sitrep-30-covid-19.pdf …
August 2020:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.23.20160895v4 …pic.twitter.com/dlnoufzPXc
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.