Thanks, helpful to clarify. I’ve seen it suggested elsewhere that we could get to community immunity while shielding the vulnerable, and then everything’s fine and the vulnerable can re-emerge and live normally. That doesn’t feel realistic.
That is a remarkable mischaracterization of epidemiology. In reality, it is all about trade offs and the QUALITY of life as well as the QUANTITY
-
-
I know that is not what you think. But at this point what the ones driving the wheels are doing is exactly that. Difficult at this point to think otherwise.
-
No it's just a very ignorant thing to say. There is an entire field of epidemiology based on quantifying the quality of life. QoL is part of the WHOs mission statement. Just a derogatory statement that reveals a lack of engagement with the field
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.