In other words, the difference between Utah, where the IFR was ~0.5%, and Lombardy, where it was ~2%, is largely to do with how many older people were infected in each place
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Question re IFR estimate for Australia - that's not based on seroprevalence? You've referred to Australia has having a 'comprehensive tracing program' - does that mean that our testing rates are high enough to infer IFR from cases tested?
-
How can it when you only test people with symptoms who choose to come forward?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PodnarSimon, a lahko prosim ta graf razložite? -
Smrtnost zaradi korone je sorazmerna starosti okuženih. Če zbolevajo mladi je nižja, če starejši pa višja.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would like to do the same analysis within the US. Per population, AZ had as many infections as NY. But it had < 1/5 deaths. The problem is that we don't have deaths by age (last time I checked.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.