Something important - the NUMBER of studies supporting a position is completely meaningless if the QUALITY of those studies is low
-
-
For example, there have been literally hundreds of studies on hydroxychloroquine. Most of them are woeful, some are decent, and a few are really good The really good ones are pretty much the driving force behind decision-making
Show this thread -
The point is that a poorly-done study doesn't allow you to answer questions. You can repeat the process of not answering a question as many times as you want, you still won't be able to conclude anything meaningful
Show this thread -
If you say "but [x] studies are positive!" about a scientific point, you've completely misunderstood how the process works
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.