The study is here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960076020302764?via%3Dihub#tbl0015 … Already up to an Altmetric of 2,543, the highest ever for the journal it's inpic.twitter.com/9GGjp7q8Gg
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I think most scientists would just read this as a tiny pilot study, and await better data That's certainly my opinion - there are too many potential sources of bias here to make any solid conclusions
Unfortunately, it is the age of COVID-19, so this study has instead gone viral on social media and is being used to recommend that people take vitamin D supplements Such is the way of 2020
I should also mention that this is not in any way an indictment of the study's authors. This was clearly meant to be a pilot study, and should be read as such It is just a shame that people have instead sensationalized the research
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.