How skeptical are you of a trial that reports 100% of screened patients randomized, 100% of randomized completed, and 100% of completed have follow-up data?
Ok, so most people think this is an issue for the paper What if I told you there were several GRIM inconsistencies in Table 1 (i.e. average values inconsistent with a stated sample size)?
-
-
I assume you’re reviewing a paper. How do you bring this up with an editor? Do you come out and say “I think the data are faked”? Or do you heavily hint at it?
-
Nope, this is published research. If I were reviewing, I would ask the authors to explain - during review, it's not an issue imo
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.