Having looked through your previous threads, I see what you're trying to say. The mistake is in using the word 'immunity', which is still not demonstrable long-term for COVID-19. I would suggest 'mitigation' or similar, because it is less wrong
Many people have made such arguments. This is in addition, of course, to the very large death toll that such immunity requires
-
-
Really? I am looking for a quantitative analysis showing that in some particular real-world situation (say, in the U.S.) containment is likely to succeed at preventing more death and suffering than strategies based on HI. Can you share a reference please?
-
Oh apologies I misunderstood your request. While I wouldn't be surprised if someone has done this, I haven't seen a paper explicitly modelling such a scenario
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.