Some basic further elucidation - parallel arm RCT, human subjects, time until follow-up more than 1 month after treatment initiation
-
-
Show this thread
-
Ok, so most people think this is an issue for the paper What if I told you there were several GRIM inconsistencies in Table 1 (i.e. average values inconsistent with a stated sample size)?
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Unusual. Depends a little on trial design and question. Possible in some ED/in theatre trials which have follow up periods of 4 hours or less and extremely few exclusion criteria but they'd certainly be the exception.
-
E.g. thinking about some of the RCTs on whether to use local anaesthetic for NGT insertion in kids. A lot of them had 100% follow up but can't think of any that had 100% consent rate.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
100% sceptical.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yikes, twitter jumped and my click landed on your poll not the post it was aimed at - re-allocate my "bit" to "not at all", or "lot skeptical" at best.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can't say without knowing anything about the study and it's design.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ah, is this an
@justsaysinmice thing? -
Nope! No mice here, an RCT of real people that took more than a month
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
depends on N
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.