Epidemiological modelling is an inexact science, what we should trust is *checks notes* the economic claims of large corporations like Wesfarmers and Jim's Mowing


https://twitter.com/Melbchief/status/1302556819772960768 …
-
-
It's also a bit frustrating because I absolutely agree that modelling has been treated as scientific fact when it is really quite uncertain
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That might be what epidemic modellers would argue, but it's not how the debate has unfolded in most places. It's pretty clear that certain considerations - social, economic, philosophical - have been relegated below a crude utilitarian calculation about fatalities + disabilities.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.