-
-
But, seems like NWAU with remoteness adjustment is quite a bit lower for remote areas than the inferred number. The main outcome here is NT and TAS losing ~60mil which is being given to VIC and NSW insteadpic.twitter.com/B79cxiw7Xc
-
This is attributed to the fact that remote areas do not provide as many of these NAP services, and since NWAU is based primarily on the number of services provided (NOT the staff/resource cost), seeing less patients means fewer NWAU allocatedpic.twitter.com/cL2eVNCChp
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
