Not at all - I gave the citation for the age-specific IFR right at the start of the thread. Second tweet
Sure, but describing that as "bias" is a leading statement. I would argue that taking deaths from an ongoing epidemic is "biased" in and of itself
And yes, absolutely! One reason why we did not include samples taken during the height of the curve 
-
-
And, again, decay rate is usually part of sensitivity calculations. We're going around in circles here
-
That's not correct - decay rate was unknown when the sens & spec were provided They are relative to & dependent on the sampling timeframes against the curves Did you examine this? Many studies actually adjust for these. Yours is one of the few who didn't
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.