Since everyone's talking about herd immunity in the United States at the moment, I thought I'd quickly run some rough calculations of the number of deaths required to get to the herd immunity threshold for COVID-19 in the U.S.
-
Show this thread
-
The age-stratified IFRs that I'll use are from my and co-authors paper available here:https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.23.20160895v4 …
3 replies 16 retweets 99 likesShow this thread -
Taking the ages/population figures from the US census, and the midpoint of the age brackets as the mean IFR for that group, you get this breakdownpic.twitter.com/CZS0k0dXCB
3 replies 22 retweets 117 likesShow this thread -
Using our bog-standard Herd Immunity Threshold calculation, which requires 70% of people to become infected, we get just over 3 million deaths required to reach herd immunitypic.twitter.com/UgiZSL8SYO
10 replies 104 retweets 220 likesShow this thread -
Now, this requires something that we actually don't see - for the older age group to be infected as often as the young This isn't very common for COVID-19
4 replies 15 retweets 101 likesShow this thread -
If we instead assume that people >65 are infected a bit less, and those >80 are infected a LOT less (in line with current trends), we get a perhaps more realistic figure of 1.76 million deaths in the U.S. before herd immunitypic.twitter.com/tSpxwwko4X
6 replies 37 retweets 152 likesShow this thread -
"But wait!", I hear some people cry, "The herd immunity threshold is lower than 70%!" Well, maybe. If we reduce the threshold to 20%, which is one of the lowest figures proposed, we see either 880,000 or 504,000 deaths depending on who gets infectedpic.twitter.com/uciCBcJUiL
9 replies 28 retweets 129 likesShow this thread -
What this means is that even in a 'best case' scenario, where elderly people are protected AND only a small fraction of people need to be infected to reach herd immunity, the U.S. would still be facing 100,000 more deaths Pretty scary stuff
9 replies 50 retweets 181 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @GidMK
Why 100k more if total needed is 500k? Doesn't that mean ~300k more?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Yes, typo! Meant to say 100,000s
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.