I'm looking for someone to give a non-hysterical, rational view of Astrazeneca being granted an indemnity from future illness as a result of the COVID19 vaccine they are producing (and who's not a rabid antivaxxer!) Not sure who to ask.
Is this one you can help with @GidMK ? 
Honestly it's probably crazily complex because indemnity means a different thing in every country
-
-
AFAIK it has been like that for all vaccines ever since 1986 in US. Majority of other countries adopted similar laws.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Childhood_Vaccine_Injury_Act …
-
Thank you
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah fair one. On the face of it; it looks worrying, and perfect tinder for the antivaxx lobby to use to further their cause. Hopefully somebody can prove otherwise.
-
It means if it goes tits up they aren't liable. It really is that simple. Remember this is a vaccine that has been tested only on healthy 18-55 years olds (People who have zero chance of dying from Covid) So it all makes terrific sense

- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.