The obvious answer is that it's always been more complex than "masks do/don't work" and the absurd dichotomization of the question by both sides is going to end badlyhttps://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1296255802932629505 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
A huge part of the problem is people instinctively dichotomize issues.
You first need a trigger and second, someone to pull it
"[...]However, starting today, if 95% of the people in the US were to wear masks when leaving their homes[...]" Question is: Did that happen?
And still no rct that demonstrates masks work...
We're having issues communicating this effectively. There's an automatic splitting (medical term}/false dichotomy that automatically happens.
Also, physical distancing, which masks cannot supercede. Nb As soon as I see/hear "social distance" vs the preferred term physical distancing, I know the author hasn't done the deep reading.
IMHE was completely wrong in predicting that deaths would be 0 by June. Rather than learn, they came out with this ridiculous prediction.
It seems so simple. Mask wearing will lessen new infections by an unknown amount depending on many factors. Then the prevention paradox kicks in and only the 1000 new infections are seen instead of the 2500 ones of which 1500 never happened. So tired of the stupidity.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.