The obvious answer is that it's always been more complex than "masks do/don't work" and the absurd dichotomization of the question by both sides is going to end badlyhttps://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1296255802932629505 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
It's just an annoying aspect of how the discourse is framed. If you argue MASKS WORK ALWAYS AND TOTALLY, then you'll inevitably be tripped up
I mean, the IHME model has, for weeks now, argued that masks could save 10,000s of lives in the U.S. I wonder if they'll reconfigure that to a more realistic estimate
Also the actions take 10-14 days for any intervention to have an impact which looks about right for that chart 
Everybody is a pattern expert
And nobody, particularly the bad faith advocates in the US, seems to have the ability to look beyond their 50 states for comparators.
This is a very odd piece: https://jordanschachtel.substack.com/p/the-worlds-toughest-lockdown-has … If a *genuine* lockdown didn’t work, it would be a hell of a wake-up call for the germ theory of disease. But there’s no interrogation at all of why lockdown policy in Peru hasn’t worked.
Indeed masks are a necessary component of a set of compensating controls necessary to reduce transmission if lockdown is not in place or eased
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.